Quoting Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 24 Jul 2006
18:18:36 +0930):
On Monday 24 July 2006 16:55, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, 2006-Jul-24 13:36:19 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>Ktrace is almost useless "out of the box" because for any non-trivial
>operation you run out of requests.
Some changes were made to improve this and this problem has mostly
gone away.
Ahh nice!
On a related note, do you think it would be possible to allow ktrace to use
pipes? I have a script which uses ktrace & kdump to monitor actions on files
so I can more easily generate port/package plists and having the intermediate
dump file is a waste (although I trim what is being dumped so it's not a huge
problem)
Feel free to write something up (plain text is enough), which explains
your wishes regarding kdump/ktrace and is usable for inclusion into
the existing entry at http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/ideas/.
Other proposals for the ideas list are accepted too, so feel free to
dump (similar to existing entries) your TODO or "nice to have" list
into our (joel and I) direction.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
lightweight adj.
Opposite of heavyweight; usually
found in combining forms such as `lightweight process'.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
