On 12/20/06, Alexander Botero-Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sat 2006-12-19 21:19:05 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> Log:
> - Update to 0.9.3-5.wink.at.nivit.;)
Approved by: nivit ?
When committing to another person's port that you're not the maintainer
of, you need to put approved by, even if the approval is implicit. That's
what (implicit) is for.
This makes no sense at all. My mission is to confuse
people, not enlighten them. Hmm, maybe it's time to
devise something more elaborate, like
Re-approved by: ports@ (ex-maintainer, placeholder; timeout - SNR too low)
Of course it would draw more attention, but at least
suggestions will be more complex.
Or maybe I should try to apply the theory behind one
of the latest eurobsdcon talks [1] to ports.
Or should I just stop reading all the feedback to my
ever so rare commits and rather expect something in
the spirit of "he had it coming" when I annoy people
enough for them to give me some metal.
Anyways, to me sleep is of top priority right now,
so good night, I wish you all to learn to stop
worrying and love... something...
[1] http://2006.eurobsdcon.org/talks-stockebrand.php
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
