On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:55:45 +0300 "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Alexander Botero-Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > sat 2006-12-19 21:19:05 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > > Log: > > > - Update to 0.9.3-5.wink.at.nivit.;) > > > > Approved by: nivit ? > > > > When committing to another person's port that you're not the > > maintainer of, you need to put approved by, even if the approval is > > implicit. That's what (implicit) is for. > > This makes no sense at all. My mission is to confuse > people, not enlighten them. [ .. ] C'mon. Did nivit approve you commit explicitly ? If yes, an 'Approved by; nivit' should be in the commit log. If not, did he gave you a blanket approval to commit to his port ? Then alexbl is right. Else you shouldn't have commited. We just had "commits w/o maintainer approval" discussion on ports@ And, oh, please, let's end this here. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #319: Your computer hasn't been returning all the bits it gets from the
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
