On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:05:31 +0100 Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergey Matveychuk píše v ne 31. 12. 2006 v 18:40 +0300: > > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > Sergey Matveychuk píše v ne 31. 12. 2006 v 16:10 +0300: > > >> Erwin Lansing wrote: > > >>> This broke INDEX as there is no x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28 port and this > > >>> is now detected. > > >> As I investigated it affects only on audio/py-karaoke port. So I'll > > >> commit a fix for this port that looks quite correct anyway: > > >> > > >> -USE_WX= 2.4+ > > >> +USE_WX= 2.4-2.6 > > > > > > So once 2.8 comes out, you promise to revisit this port? > > > > > > > The port should be checked with 2.8. I'm not sure it'll work with 2.8. > > The original author felt confident that the port will work with a future > releases of wxPython, thus he put 2.4+ in the port. > > If he would not be sure, he would put 2.4-2.6 in there straight away. > > > When we add a new gcc version, we don't check all ports if they work. > We assume everything will work, and fix or mark the cases where there's > a problem. Why we should treat wxPython any different? > You are right. Best Regards, Ale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
