On 9/29/07, Garance A Drosehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 4:39 PM +0000 9/27/07, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > Modified files: > > sys/kern sched_ule.c > > Log: > > - ... > > - Assert that we're not trying to compile ULE on an unsupported > > architecture. To date, I believe only i386 and amd64 have > > implemented the third cpu switch argument required. > > > > Approved by: re > > Does this mean that I should not switch to ULE on my single-CPU PowerPC > mini-Mac? >
I was under the impression that BSD is preferred to ULE for single-processor systems, irregardless of the processor architecture. -Ben Kaduk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
