Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals > > on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor > > and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware. > Are you implying that Jack has no merit? That's an unfortunate > assertion. What evidence do you have to support that?
It is you who implied rather strongly that Jack is neither more nor less than an Intel representative. You spoke of "lecturing a vendor" when all Erik did was point out or own rules to a *committer*. > > We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested > > before being committed, especially to -STABLE. > I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had > undergone extensive testing. I guess you missed the part where his commit broke the tinderbox, because he clearly did not test the DEVICE_POLLING case. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
