On 10/6/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals > > > on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor > > > and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware. > > Are you implying that Jack has no merit? That's an unfortunate > > assertion. What evidence do you have to support that? > > It is you who implied rather strongly that Jack is neither more nor less > than an Intel representative. You spoke of "lecturing a vendor" when > all Erik did was point out or own rules to a *committer*. > > > > We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested > > > before being committed, especially to -STABLE. > > I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had > > undergone extensive testing. > > I guess you missed the part where his commit broke the tinderbox, > because he clearly did not test the DEVICE_POLLING case. >
No one is perfect, and YUP, we don't test POLLING, so here I am on my weekend fixing it, I don't get paid for that, and I also don't get paid for all the advocation I do for this community to Intel management. Jack _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
