Claus Reinke wrote:
cool stuff!-)
btw, the basic breakpoint functionality could indeed be provided
as a compiler/IDE transformation, but calling out to GHCi makes
a lot more sense:
I think you misunderstand me: I wanted to avoid the recompilation step
when adding a breakpoint, that's all. The interface would be exactly
the same. You're right, the idea of using GHCi as the interactive
debugger is absolutely key: only GHCi has full information about the
program, so anything else would be a compromise.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
