Hello Simon, Monday, April 3, 2006, 11:45:35 PM, you wrote:
>> btw, the basic breakpoint functionality could indeed be provided >> as a compiler/IDE transformation, but calling out to GHCi makes >> a lot more sense: > I think you misunderstand me: I wanted to avoid the recompilation step > when adding a breakpoint, that's all. The interface would be exactly but this can be implemented just by adding call to special function after each operation in I/O monad. this function will check whether we reached breakpoint and pause program if so. this approach is simpler to implement and allow easily extend breakpoints' types (line number, condition, line number+condition, variable changed....). this should be slower, but i think in most cases this cost should be acceptable -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
