> > Does this harm gcc? > > I'm afraid it does: the arguments are usually C files and -l options > for libraries, and the libraries are scanned in the order they appear. > Put them too early, and it fails to find a symbol defined in a later > file. Perhaps we should make it vary.
What if we move the -o option before the filename? Then there won't usually be a warning, which is better. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
