On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote: > > > Does this harm gcc? > > > > I'm afraid it does: the arguments are usually C files and -l options > > for libraries, and the libraries are scanned in the order they appear. > > Put them too early, and it fails to find a symbol defined in a later > > file. Perhaps we should make it vary. > > What if we move the -o option before the filename? Then there won't > usually be a warning, which is better.
That would be fine. _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
