On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:20:48PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> Ian, what do you think?
I've had a little play with it, and it does indeed seem nice.
In particular, it makes it quite easy to extract the testsuite summary,
as well as a the bits of the log corresponding to the failures, and
making them available separately to the complete log.
The results of my playing are at:
http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/buildbot/
(this is just a snapshot of the real thing, which isn't accessible. Only
the links in the top left "run testsuite" box will work).
No problems under Windows (the left column) or Linux (the right column).
I'll investigate getting a proper installation set up.
> I suspect that we'll have to move some of the cleverness from the nightly
> build
> scripts into the main source tree, to avoid having to port too much of that
> stuff to the buildbot config. That's not a bad idea anyway.
I think we'll still want to have per-slave scripts in the ghc-nightly
repo, as that seems nicer than having to fiddle with the master whenever
you want to change details of one slave. Something like pre-build
(things like making mk/build.mk and setting up paths) and post-build
(putting the tarballs somewhere accessible) maybe.
Thanks
Ian
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
