Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
David
Great stuff
Do you think you could start a Wiki page describing the Haddock-isation
in the (new) Commentary?
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary
That would be a good place to accumulate the answers to Duncan's
questions, for example. Don't go overboard -- too much detail just
gets out of sync -- but an overview in the style of the rest of the
commentary would be v helpful.
A question I have is this: have you also rejigged Haddock itself so that
it uses the GHC Api? In the end that was the whole point of the
exercise, so that Haddock would always be able to understand anything
that GHC could understand.
The darcs repo containing David's new version of Haddock, which works via the
GHC API, is here:
http://darcs.haskell.org/SoC/haddock.ghc/
As I understand it, it's still not completely stable, but it'll be easier to
work on now that the GHC changes are in the HEAD. I'm sure David would welcome
any offers of help or (probably later) willing testers.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
