On 6/13/07, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know time is a bit variable, but is there any idea of when this
might be accomplished? Is there anything fundamental that is holding
you back? Something like writing Read/Show serialisation would take a
day at most, and give me everything I want. I realise that you are
going for something better, but the time/features trade-off is ever
present :)


There is nothing fundamental that's holding us back; it's just a
matter of finding time (I'm moving out of state and starting grad
school, Aaron was busy finishing up the semester). I'm not sure
offhand why just doing Read/Show wouldn't work or didn't occur to us;
is there a reason why that wouldn't be straightforward? (Adding Aaron
to the CC list to see what he thinks.) It's probably just that we were
trying to do the Right Thing.

The other question is whether there will be a small standalone library
called "GHC.Core" which lets a user load an abstract syntax tree out
of a file?


I think there should be, but AFAIK there's nothing in that direction yet.

Cheers,
Tim

--
Tim Chevalier* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Often in error, never in doubt
"When nothing remains of me, / Not a particle, / I shall sparkle in the
footnote of an article." -- Daniel Aaron

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to