On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:08:26PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote: > On 6/16/07, Aaron Tomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >We've been leaning away from having a specific data type for External > >Core, and just using the existing data types in GHC (such as > >IfaceExpr and CoreExpr). So it's unclear what data type we'd add > >deriving(Show) to. > > There's nothing to stop us from just adding deriving(Show) and > deriving(Read) to those existing data types, right? Of course, this > requires adding instances for a number of data types. I guess the real > problem is that someone such as Neil who wants to read in the > resulting code would have to import a lot of code from GHC.
Why is that a problem? It's almost completely automatic: import GHC Stefan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
