> OK so regardless of doing the "ship ExtCore ps doc with GHC" issue, we should > in-place > update the doc at http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/papers/core.ps.gz
I was actually suggesting that the documentation should _not_ be updated in place, which I think is what Tim was initially proposing. I suspect Tim's document will cover different things from Andrew's, and Andrew's will remain useful as a snapshot of Core at a point in history, as Tim's evolves with the language. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
