Hi, Thanks Thorkil, more information:
=====> 2228(normal) cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2228 </dev/null >2228.run.stdout 2>2228.run.stderr =====> 2636(normal) cd ./ghc-e/should_run && $MAKE --no-print-directory -s 2636 </dev/null >2636.run.stdout 2>2636.run.stderr Actual stdout output differs from expected: --- ./ghc-e/should_run\2228.stdout.normalised 2008-10-17 16:03:32.386896400 +0100 +++ ./ghc-e/should_run\2228.run.stdout.normalised 2008-10-17 16:03:32.386896400 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -BlockBuffering Nothing +LineBuffering BlockBuffering Nothing *** unexpected failure for 2228(normal) ====> Running ./ghci/prog001/prog001.T =====> prog001(ghci) cd ./ghci/prog001 && HC='c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' HC_OPTS='-dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output ' 'c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' --interactive -v0 -ignore-dot-ghci -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output <prog001.script >prog001.run.stdout 2>prog001.run.stderr ====> Running ./ghci/prog002/prog002.T Could it be that buffering has a different default on Windows? =====> break008(ghci) cd ./ghci.debugger/scripts && HC='c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' HC_OPTS='-dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output ' 'c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' --interactive -v0 -ignore-dot-ghci -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output -ignore-dot-ghci <break008.script >break008.run.stdout 2>break008.run.stderr Actual stdout output differs from expected: =====> break009(ghci) cd ./ghci.debugger/scripts && HC='c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' HC_OPTS='-dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output ' 'c:/ghc-build/ghc/ghc/stage2-inplace/ghc' --interactive -v0 -ignore-dot-ghci -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -Di386_unknown_mingw32 -dno-debug-output -ignore-dot-ghci <break009.script >break009.run.stdout 2>break009.run.stderr --- ./ghci.debugger/scripts\break008.stdout.normalised 2008-10-17 16:04:39.247127200 +0100 +++ ./ghci.debugger/scripts\break008.run.stdout.normalised 2008-10-17 16:04:39.247127200 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -Breakpoint 0 activated at ../Test3.hs:1:13-14 -Stopped at ../Test3.hs:1:13-14 -_result :: [a] = _ +Cannot find default module for breakpoint. +Perhaps no modules are loaded for debugging? +[] *** unexpected failure for break008(ghci) And a GHCi debugger issue. As a secondary issue, it appears that the failure reports are occuring after the script has started to print out information about the next test. Thanks Neil > -----Original Message----- > From: Thorkil Naur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2008 4:53 pm > To: Mitchell, Neil > Cc: cvs-ghc@haskell.org > Subject: Re: Validation failures under Windows > > Hello, > > On Friday 17 October 2008 17:41, Mitchell, Neil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Doing validation under Windows XP, using HEAD from a few > hours ago, I > > get the results: > > > > OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at The current date is: > > 17/10/2008 Enter the new date: (dd-mm-yy) > > 2221 total tests, which gave rise to > > 8313 test cases, of which > > 0 caused framework failures > > 6400 were skipped > > > > 1841 expected passes > > 70 expected failures > > 0 unexpected passes > > 2 unexpected failures > > > > Unexpected failures: > > 2228(normal) > > break008(ghci) > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > `/cygdrive/c/ghc-build/ghc/testsuite/tests/ghc-regres > > s' > > make: Leaving directory > > `/cygdrive/c/ghc-build/ghc/testsuite/tests/ghc-regress' > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Oops! Looks like you have some unexpected test results or > framework > > failures. > > Please fix them before pushing/sending patches. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Are there some additional files I can grab that will tell > people more? > > Assuming this is done by the validate script, there should be > a file, testlog, in the top directory with the detailed > results for each test. The details for those that fail > (2228(normal) and break008(ghci)) would possibly tell some > people more. > > > ... > > Thanks and best regards > Thorkil > > ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
