On 01/03/2010 11:54, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
Thu Feb 25 09:40:28 PST 2010 [email protected]
* Change pretty printing of InlinePrag slightly
M ./compiler/basicTypes/BasicTypes.lhs -2 +2
Is it possible that this patch, or another recent patch, broke this test?
=====> spec-inline(optc) 595 of 2466 [0, 0, 0]
cd ./simplCore/should_compile &&
'/64playpen/simonmar/validate/bindisttest/install dir/bin/ghc'
-fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -no-user-package-conf
-dno-debug-output -c spec-inline.hs -O -fvia-C -O2 -ddump-simpl
-dsuppress-uniques -fno-code >spec-inline.comp.stderr 2>&1
Actual stderr output differs from expected:
--- ./simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.stderr.normalised
2010-03-01 15:10:17.000000000 +0000
+++ ./simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.comp.stderr.normalised
2010-03-01 15:10:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
}
}
-Roman.foo_go [InlPrag=INLINE [0]]
+Roman.foo_go [InlPrag=INLINE[0]]
:: Data.Maybe.Maybe GHC.Types.Int
-> Data.Maybe.Maybe GHC.Types.Int
-> GHC.Types.Int
*** unexpected failure for spec-inline(optc)
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
