sorry yes almost certainly. Not sure how that got past my validate run..will check.
S | -----Original Message----- | From: Simon Marlow [mailto:[email protected]] | Sent: 01 March 2010 15:45 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: [email protected] | Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): Change pretty printing of InlinePrag slightly | | On 01/03/2010 11:54, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: | > Thu Feb 25 09:40:28 PST 2010 [email protected] | > * Change pretty printing of InlinePrag slightly | > | > M ./compiler/basicTypes/BasicTypes.lhs -2 +2 | | Is it possible that this patch, or another recent patch, broke this test? | | =====> spec-inline(optc) 595 of 2466 [0, 0, 0] | cd ./simplCore/should_compile && | '/64playpen/simonmar/validate/bindisttest/install dir/bin/ghc' | -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -no-user-package-conf | -dno-debug-output -c spec-inline.hs -O -fvia-C -O2 -ddump-simpl | -dsuppress-uniques -fno-code >spec-inline.comp.stderr 2>&1 | Actual stderr output differs from expected: | --- ./simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.stderr.normalised | 2010-03-01 15:10:17.000000000 +0000 | +++ ./simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.comp.stderr.normalised | 2010-03-01 15:10:17.000000000 +0000 | @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ | } | } | | -Roman.foo_go [InlPrag=INLINE [0]] | +Roman.foo_go [InlPrag=INLINE[0]] | :: Data.Maybe.Maybe GHC.Types.Int | -> Data.Maybe.Maybe GHC.Types.Int | -> GHC.Types.Int | *** unexpected failure for spec-inline(optc) | | Cheers, | Simon _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
