On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:40:00AM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > Why not? I thought, 7.2 was supposed to include DPH (not in the binary, but > as an extra download from Hackage).
The easiest way to be sure dph isn't accidentally in the binary, and that building from source doesn't accidentally require it, is to not have it in the default builds. We can still do validate runs with it, with "./sync-all --dph get". > If we don't maintain a 7.2 branch dph repo and keep validating it with the > main compiler, I don't think that is going to work out. We can certainly branch dph. What about primitive and vector (which have darcs upstreams)? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
