On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:05:24PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > Ian Lynagh: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:04:39PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > >> Ian Lynagh: > >>> > >>> We can certainly branch dph. What about primitive and vector (which have > >>> darcs upstreams)? > >> > >> How do you handle other packages with upstream repos? We might want to > >> branch them, so that we don't have to track changes to primitive and > >> vector in the dph branch. > > > > Upstreams haven't branched, but I have branched the GHC git repos. This > > means that changes made for HEAD won't break 7.2, and we can decide to > > stick with an old version in the 7.2 branch. > > That sounds very sensible. Let's do the same with primitive and vector.
OK; I've made a ghc-7.2 branch in the dph, vector and primitive repos. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
