On 9 August 2011 11:46, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks > > I've done ./sync-all pull (99% sure). Should I do anything else? > > Or is the patch only in the upstream Cabal? In which case, it should be > pulled into the GHC repos before committing, no? Else validate fails.
No I learnt from my mistake last time (I hope so anyway!) and manually sync'd our lagging Cabal with upstream after pushing the patch. > > I'm retrying... some new patches from Cabal do seem to have arrived... maybe > it'll work this time. I'll let you know if not. > > Simon > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David > | Terei > | Sent: 09 August 2011 19:38 > | To: Simon Peyton-Jones > | Cc: [email protected] > | Subject: Re: Safe Haskell validate failure > | > | On 9 August 2011 00:34, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > | > I'm getting this on a clean validate on Windows > | > > | > base:Prelude can't be safely imported! The package (base) the module > | > resides in isn't trusted. > | > > | > Any ideas? > | > > | > | You need to pull in a recent path to Cabal. > | > | Cheers, > | David > > > _______________________________________________ > Cvs-ghc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc > _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
