On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:16:44PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | > Or is the patch only in the upstream Cabal? In which case, it should be > pulled > | into the GHC repos before committing, no? Else validate fails. > | > | No I learnt from my mistake last time (I hope so anyway!) and manually > | sync'd our lagging Cabal with upstream after pushing the patch. > > Aha! So I didn't do that! Ian, what's the protocol? Should David push to > the lagging GHC Cabal repo under circumstances like this? If he manually > syncs his own copy, he's going to succeed in validating while the rest of us > fail.
I think David means he's pushed the patches to our lagging repo, so everything should be working. If there's a patch missing from somewhere, can someone tell me which patch, where it is, and where it's missing from please? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
