Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is Haddock'd for NHC, the link to unsafeCoerce# will yield an
> error message, I suppose, even if we precede with "In GHC,
> 'unsafeCoerce' is just..."
>
> So I'm still not sure what to do. For now it's as above. Perhaps
> someone who knows how it should come out on, say nhc or hugs, can
> modify it appropriately?
I have added some text to clarify that the safety depends on which
compiler you are using, documented roughly what is safe in nhc98, and
kept the forward link to GHC.Base.unsafeCoerce#. Maybe Hugs and jhc
experts could add some text about those implementations too.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Cvs-libraries mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
