On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | > Ah, good point. How do we say "GHC only" in documentation? In words? Or > with #ifdef? > | > | It's better to have the same documentation for everyone, with words about > | what's implementation-specific. > > The words in Unsafe.Coerce are these: > > -- 'unsafeCoerce' is just a trivial wrapper for 'unsafeCoerce#'; > -- see the latter for important documentation about correct usage. > > If this is Haddock'd for NHC, the link to unsafeCoerce# will yield an error > message, I suppose, even if we precede with "In GHC, 'unsafeCoerce' is > just..."
This is just a warning so, while not ideal, it will work. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
