wrowe 2002/07/11 17:53:43
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Revert the other significant response to trolling, it didn't belong in
status.
Revision Changes Path
1.150 +2 -8 apr/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.149
retrieving revision 1.150
diff -u -r1.149 -r1.150
--- STATUS 12 Jul 2002 00:30:59 -0000 1.149
+++ STATUS 12 Jul 2002 00:53:43 -0000 1.150
@@ -120,13 +120,7 @@
Saying that apr_time_t doesn't imply seconds is to ignore the
fact that all of those httpd functions used to create APR were
defined in terms of seconds and make no use of microseconds.]
-
- [wrowe: read code.]
-
- [fielding: I read it. I know exactly which functions from httpd
- that I wrote were subsequently broken when they were moved into
APR.]
-
- [fielding: Meanwhile, the only reason we have this stupid debate is
+ Meanwhile, the only reason we have this stupid debate is
because wrowe insists that time_t is 32 bits and therefore dies in
2038.
In fact, time_t is 64 bits on 64bit NT, Linux, OSF, and probably
others that I haven't checked. In any case, since we use the
