wrowe 2002/07/12 14:46:18
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Refine my suggested names for both alternatives.
Revision Changes Path
1.159 +4 -3 apr/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.158
retrieving revision 1.159
diff -u -r1.158 -r1.159
--- STATUS 12 Jul 2002 21:40:20 -0000 1.158
+++ STATUS 12 Jul 2002 21:46:18 -0000 1.159
@@ -80,13 +80,14 @@
units represented. Needs a better suggestion than apr_timeval_t.
+1: aaron, brianp, ianh
-0: jerenkrantz, striker, dreid
- -0.5: rbb, wrowe
+ -0.5: rbb
+ wrowe [prefers apr_utime_t and apr_uspan_t where u==undefined]
3) Renaming the function to get rid of apr_time_t vs time_t confusion,
and strongly identify the type as apr_busec_t or apr_butime_t, with
an ongoing contract with users about the type's units.
+1: fielding [prefers apr_busec or simple time_t / struct tm]
- +0.5: wrowe, [prefers apr_butime_t but isn't going to fight that]
+ +0.5: wrowe, [prefers apr_time_busec_t and apr_span_busec_t]
brianp
-0: striker, jerenkrantz
-0.5: rbb, ianh, dreid
