[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I actually considered doing this, but I don't believe that it is a good > idea. The problem is the amount of information you get if things > fail. With this change you get: > > 50 tests run: 49 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented. > Failed tests: > 1) calloc_bytes: assert failed > > Without it, you get: > > 50 tests run: 49 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented. > Failed tests: > 1) calloc_bytes: expected pointer <(nil)> but was <0x61> > > I would mucch rather have the added information.
The previous code was not valid C. "testpools.c", line 101.37: 1506-280 (S) Function argument assignment between types "void*" and "char" is not allowed. Maybe you want to add an appropriate flavor of CuAssert that checks characters? -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
