On 23 Oct 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I actually considered doing this, but I don't believe that it is a good > > idea. The problem is the amount of information you get if things > > fail. With this change you get: > > > > 50 tests run: 49 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented. > > Failed tests: > > 1) calloc_bytes: assert failed > > > > Without it, you get: > > > > 50 tests run: 49 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented. > > Failed tests: > > 1) calloc_bytes: expected pointer <(nil)> but was <0x61> > > > > I would mucch rather have the added information. > > The previous code was not valid C. > > "testpools.c", line 101.37: 1506-280 (S) Function argument assignment > between types "void*" and "char" is not allowed. > > Maybe you want to add an appropriate flavor of CuAssert that checks > characters?
Ok, I'll get this fixed today. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
