Author: toad Date: 2009-01-21 00:14:32 +0000 (Wed, 21 Jan 2009) New Revision: 25157
Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php Log: Delete "partly because it has different functionality". The threat model is closely related to what services we provide... Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php =================================================================== --- trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 00:13:27 UTC (rev 25156) +++ trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 00:14:32 UTC (rev 25157) @@ -449,8 +449,8 @@ <p><b id="attack">Won't attack X break Freenet's anonymity?</b></p> <p><b>Short answer:</b> Probably yes.</p> <p><b>Long answer:</b></p> -<p>Freenet has a different threat model to Tor and the Mixmaster remailers, -partly because it has different functionality. Freenet is designed to resist +<p>Freenet has a different threat model to Tor and the Mixmaster remailers. +Freenet is designed to resist censorship. The network must therefore be robust, and content must be distributed without requiring a central server, whether anonymous or not. Defences focus generally on a distant attacker attempting to find a whistleblower. Tor on the _______________________________________________ cvs mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
