Author: toad Date: 2009-01-21 00:17:07 +0000 (Wed, 21 Jan 2009) New Revision: 25158
Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php Log: elaborate Modified: trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php =================================================================== --- trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 00:14:32 UTC (rev 25157) +++ trunk/website/pages/en/faq.php 2009-01-21 00:17:07 UTC (rev 25158) @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ Freenet is designed to resist censorship. The network must therefore be robust, and content must be distributed without requiring a central server, whether anonymous or not. Defences focus -generally on a distant attacker attempting to find a whistleblower. Tor on the +generally on a distant attacker attempting to find the source of some content (e.g. a whistleblower). Tor on the other hand is designed to anonymise real-time data streams, and assumes that there is a "free world" where a large number of nodes can be run in the open without any threat of their being shut down. Freenet also has no concept of a _______________________________________________ cvs mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
