User: jpmcc   
Date: 2009-09-28 16:59:12+0000
Modified:
   marketing/www/planet/atom.xml
   marketing/www/planet/index.html
   marketing/www/planet/opml.xml
   marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml
   marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml

Log:
 Planet run at Mon Sep 28 18:00:13 BST 2009

File Changes:

Directory: /marketing/www/planet/
=================================

File [changed]: atom.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.2407&r2=1.2408
Delta lines:  +42 -40
---------------------
--- atom.xml    2009-09-28 10:58:50+0000        1.2407
+++ atom.xml    2009-09-28 16:59:07+0000        1.2408
@@ -5,10 +5,43 @@
        <link rel="self" 
href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/>
        <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/>
        <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id>
-       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:22+00:00</updated>
+       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:27+00:00</updated>
        <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 
+http://www.planetplanet.org</generator>
 
        <entry>
+               <title type="html">Prototyping a New User Interface for OOo - 
July Status Update for Project Renaissance</title>
+               <link 
href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/prototyping_a_new_ui_july"/>
+               <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/cdd491543c9537cd</id>
+               <updated>2009-09-28T10:38:44+00:00</updated>
+               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Project Renaissance Home Page&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 width=&quot;318&quot; height=&quot;111&quot; 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png&quot;
 alt=&quot;Project Renaissance Logo&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;The  &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Prototyping&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototyping Home&quot;&gt;prototyping phase&lt;/a&gt;, to create a 
new user interface for OpenOffice.org, has ended last week. See our monthly 
project &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/4/42/Renaissance-status-2009-07-30.odp&quot;
 title=&quot;Status Presentation&quot;&gt;Renaissance status presentation for 
July&lt;/a&gt; and&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://tools.services.openoffice.org/impressprototype/impressprototype.jnlp&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototype (Java 6 required)&quot;&gt; try the prototype 
yourself&lt;/a&gt; (Java 6 required). It is not only about Impress, we are 
working on a UI for the entire OOo. You will be asked to give feedback when 
closing the prototype. Make use of it!&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Note: The prototype is a mid-fidelity one. So no polished UI. We
+just want to be able to test the interaction. Content of the toolbars
+and the group labeling are subject to change. They show just what can
+be done in this prototype. This allows us to create UX tests that can
+be run with current OOo and the prototypes.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Best regards,&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Frank  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/f/f2/Prototype.jpg/778px-Prototype.jpg&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
+               <author>
+                       <name>frankl</name>
+                       <uri></uri>
+               </author>
+               <source>
+                       <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
+                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
+                       
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
+               </source>
+       </entry>
+
+       <entry>
                <title type="html">OpenOffice.org Newsletter is out 
(Danish)</title>
                <link 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-newsletter-is-out-danish.html"/>
                
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8718185590131291864</id>
@@ -104,7 +137,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -141,7 +174,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -225,7 +258,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -249,7 +282,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -274,7 +307,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -405,7 +438,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -429,7 +462,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -450,7 +483,7 @@
                        <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google 
Reader</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/>
                        
<id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-28T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-09-28T17:00:16+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -515,35 +548,4 @@
                </source>
        </entry>
 
-       <entry xml:lang="en">
-               <title type="html">Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-               <link 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/"/>
-               
<id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</id>
-               <updated>2009-08-31T16:01:45+00:00</updated>
-               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I 
think it&amp;#8217;s a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The 
month of August was not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small 
revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events 
inside the &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse 
Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</content>
-               <author>
-                       <name>Charles Schulz</name>
-                       <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri>
-               </author>
-               <source>
-                       <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by 
Standards » OOo Postings</title>
-                       <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. 
Schulz.</subtitle>
-                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/>
-                       
<id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-24T11:00:17+00:00</updated>
-               </source>
-       </entry>
-
 </feed>

File [changed]: index.html
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.2414&r2=1.2415
Delta lines:  +31 -27
---------------------
--- index.html  2009-09-28 10:58:51+0000        1.2414
+++ index.html  2009-09-28 16:59:08+0000        1.2415
@@ -36,8 +36,38 @@
 <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a>
 </div>
 
-<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 28, 2009 11:00 
AM GMT</em></p>
+<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 28, 2009 05:00 
PM GMT</em></p>
 
+<h2>September 28, 2009</h2>
+<h3>
+<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader">
+GullFOSS</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
+<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/prototyping_a_new_ui_july";>
+Prototyping a New User Interface for OOo - July Status Update for Project 
Renaissance</a>
+</h3>
+<p>
+<p> </p> 
+  <p><a title="Project Renaissance Home Page" 
href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance";><img width="318" 
height="111" 
src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png";
 alt="Project Renaissance Logo" /></a> </p> 
+  <p>The  <a 
href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Prototyping"; 
title="Prototyping Home">prototyping phase</a>, to create a new user interface 
for OpenOffice.org, has ended last week. See our monthly project <a 
href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/4/42/Renaissance-status-2009-07-30.odp";
 title="Status Presentation">Renaissance status presentation for July</a> and<a 
href="http://tools.services.openoffice.org/impressprototype/impressprototype.jnlp";
 title="Prototype (Java 6 required)"> try the prototype yourself</a> (Java 6 
required). It is not only about Impress, we are working on a UI for the entire 
OOo. You will be asked to give feedback when closing the prototype. Make use of 
it!</p> 
+  <p>Note: The prototype is a mid-fidelity one. So no polished UI. We
+just want to be able to test the interaction. Content of the toolbars
+and the group labeling are subject to change. They show just what can
+be done in this prototype. This allows us to create UX tests that can
+be run with current OOo and the prototypes.</p> 
+  <p> Best regards,</p> 
+  <p> Frank  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  </p> 
+  <p><img 
src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/f/f2/Prototype.jpg/778px-Prototype.jpg";
 /><br /></p></p>
+<p>
+<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/prototyping_a_new_ui_july";>by 
frankl at September 28, 2009 10:38 AM GMT</a></em>
+</p>
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
 <h2>September 27, 2009</h2>
 <h3>
 <a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/search/label/OpenOffice.org"; 
title="Lodahl's blog">
@@ -459,32 +489,6 @@
 <br />
 <hr />
 <br />
-<h3>
-<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by 
Standards » OOo Postings">
-Charles Schulz</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
-<a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>
-Mythbusting in the end of August</a>
-</h3>
-<p>
-<p>Coming back from vacations I think it&#8217;s a good time to set the clocks 
back at the right time. The month of August was not vacation time for everyone. 
In fact, there was a small revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay 
attention to the events inside the <a href="http://opensuse.org";>OpenSuse 
Community</a>. There was also a <a 
href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=TheOpenRoad";>very
 good blog post by Matt Asay</a>, but Matt still does not get that sometimes 
official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Today, I will try to bust some myths and attempt to 
explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially in the field 
of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough</p>
-<p class="Standard">After some intense debate, <a 
href="http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news";>the OpenSuse 
Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default desktop.</a></p>
-<p class="Standard">This decision that some might find surprising is actually 
not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the Linux desktop every 
day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not the most 
overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best funded 
desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular one (to 
be sure, it&#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop environments). It 
is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the OpenSuse project. 
SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell offerings, was a 
predominantly KDE distribution.</p>
-<p class="Standard">But with its acquisition and the buyout of Ximian, Gnome 
became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come to appreciate 
so far such as Mono. Don&#8217;t get me wrong; I&#8217;m not pondering whether 
KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&#8217;m just pointing out that for years 
we were told that there was no other way outside Gnome by some who had vested 
economic interests in this platform. KDE did its transformation through its 4.0 
release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome has a different philosophy: it 
aims at developing an easy to use desktop that can be easily portable. I am 
sure that we will see some radical improvements in the Gnome 3.0 release, 
albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet KDE 4 is quickly picking 
up steam by using some appealing technologies such as Qt, while Gnome has to 
deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK versions. These liabilities 
make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web application in comparison. It 
is of course impossible at this stage to guess who will be the dominant desktop 
environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 years. Times are changing. On a 
personal level, I most often use Gnome but spend more and more time on KDE. In 
fact, this blog is written on KDE.</p>
-<p class="Standard">The announcement by the OpenSuse Community that it would 
revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about the immaturity 
of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic market share.</p>
-<p class="Standard">The use of the word &#8220;anemic&#8221; comes from Matt 
Asay&#8217;s blog. Let me make this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 
release has generated over 20 million downloads. The news can be found at the 
OpenOffice.org website, but the bottomline is that our infrastructure is 
suffering from the number of downloads. These downloads are just the ones 
officially counted in our infrastructure. There are many servers out there we 
simply don&#8217;t count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account 
the number of OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the 
numbers of these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the 
total Linux market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is 
now more an ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique 
downloads and IP addresses &#8216; counters report over a million users of 
Fedora 10. What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
<a href="http://download.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org 3.1.1</a> .</p>
-<p class="Standard">Of course, these numbers may look anemic when compared to 
Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite relevant; I don&#8217;t 
know many people who rush over to download Microsoft Office for free. They 
usually get it on their computers and don&#8217;t think about it much further. 
So Matt is essentially comparing apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to 
walk all the way to the user; it basically lands on consumers, thanks to 
longstanding OEM agreements with Microsoft and monopolistic practices. 
OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may be anemic to some, but we will never be 
monopolistic to anyone.</p>
-<p class="Standard">&nbsp;</p>
-<p class="akst_link"><a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&akst_action=share-this"; 
title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_137" 
class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
-</p></p>
-<p>
-<em><a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>by
 Charles at August 31, 2009 04:01 PM GMT</a></em>
-</p>
-<br />
-<hr />
-<br />
 <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a>
 <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those 
 of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the 

File [changed]: opml.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.2407&r2=1.2408
Delta lines:  +1 -1
-------------------
--- opml.xml    2009-09-28 10:58:52+0000        1.2407
+++ opml.xml    2009-09-28 16:59:08+0000        1.2408
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <opml version="1.1">
        <head>
                <title>Marketing Planet</title>
-               <dateModified>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:00:22 +0000</dateModified>
+               <dateModified>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:00:27 +0000</dateModified>
                <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName>
                <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail>
        </head>

File [changed]: rss10.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.840&r2=1.841
Delta lines:  +23 -19
---------------------
--- rss10.xml   2009-09-27 22:58:55+0000        1.840
+++ rss10.xml   2009-09-28 16:59:08+0000        1.841
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
        <items>
                <rdf:Seq>
+                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/cdd491543c9537cd" />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8718185590131291864"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-9216480267512724012"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/7044fbbf8c760132" />
@@ -32,11 +33,32 @@
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5093339025467706843"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5957209486493165012"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2176431139066722436"
 />
-                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";
 />
                </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
 </channel>
 
+<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/cdd491543c9537cd">
+       <title>GullFOSS: Prototyping a New User Interface for OOo - July Status 
Update for Project Renaissance</title>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/prototyping_a_new_ui_july</link>
+       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Project Renaissance Home Page&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 width=&quot;318&quot; height=&quot;111&quot; 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png&quot;
 alt=&quot;Project Renaissance Logo&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;The  &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Prototyping&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototyping Home&quot;&gt;prototyping phase&lt;/a&gt;, to create a 
new user interface for OpenOffice.org, has ended last week. See our monthly 
project &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/4/42/Renaissance-status-2009-07-30.odp&quot;
 title=&quot;Status Presentation&quot;&gt;Renaissance status presentation for 
July&lt;/a&gt; and&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://tools.services.openoffice.org/impressprototype/impressprototype.jnlp&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototype (Java 6 required)&quot;&gt; try the prototype 
yourself&lt;/a&gt; (Java 6 required). It is not only about Impress, we are 
working on a UI for the entire OOo. You will be asked to give feedback when 
closing the prototype. Make use of it!&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Note: The prototype is a mid-fidelity one. So no polished UI. We
+just want to be able to test the interaction. Content of the toolbars
+and the group labeling are subject to change. They show just what can
+be done in this prototype. This allows us to create UX tests that can
+be run with current OOo and the prototypes.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Best regards,&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Frank  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/f/f2/Prototype.jpg/778px-Prototype.jpg&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
+       <dc:date>2009-09-28T10:38:44+00:00</dc:date>
+       <dc:creator>frankl</dc:creator>
+</item>
 <item 
rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8718185590131291864">
        <title>Leif Lodahl: OpenOffice.org Newsletter is out (Danish)</title>
        
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-newsletter-is-out-danish.html</link>
@@ -307,23 +329,5 @@
        <dc:date>2009-08-31T19:54:21+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator>
 </item>
-<item 
rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>
-       <title>Charles Schulz: Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-       
<link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</link>
-       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I think 
it&amp;#8217;s a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The month 
of August was not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small 
revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events 
inside the &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse 
Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
-       <dc:date>2009-08-31T16:01:45+00:00</dc:date>
-</item>
 
 </rdf:RDF>

File [changed]: rss20.xml
Url: 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.840&r2=1.841
Delta lines:  +22 -19
---------------------
--- rss20.xml   2009-09-27 22:58:56+0000        1.840
+++ rss20.xml   2009-09-28 16:59:09+0000        1.841
@@ -8,6 +8,28 @@
        <description>Marketing Planet - 
http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description>
 
 <item>
+       <title>GullFOSS: Prototyping a New User Interface for OOo - July Status 
Update for Project Renaissance</title>
+       <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/cdd491543c9537cd</guid>
+       
<link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/prototyping_a_new_ui_july</link>
+       <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Project Renaissance Home Page&quot; 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance&quot;&gt;&lt;img
 width=&quot;318&quot; height=&quot;111&quot; 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png&quot;
 alt=&quot;Project Renaissance Logo&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;The  &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:Prototyping&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototyping Home&quot;&gt;prototyping phase&lt;/a&gt;, to create a 
new user interface for OpenOffice.org, has ended last week. See our monthly 
project &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/4/42/Renaissance-status-2009-07-30.odp&quot;
 title=&quot;Status Presentation&quot;&gt;Renaissance status presentation for 
July&lt;/a&gt; and&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://tools.services.openoffice.org/impressprototype/impressprototype.jnlp&quot;
 title=&quot;Prototype (Java 6 required)&quot;&gt; try the prototype 
yourself&lt;/a&gt; (Java 6 required). It is not only about Impress, we are 
working on a UI for the entire OOo. You will be asked to give feedback when 
closing the prototype. Make use of it!&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;Note: The prototype is a mid-fidelity one. So no polished UI. We
+just want to be able to test the interaction. Content of the toolbars
+and the group labeling are subject to change. They show just what can
+be done in this prototype. This allows us to create UX tests that can
+be run with current OOo and the prototypes.&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Best regards,&lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt; Frank  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  &lt;/p&gt; 
+  &lt;p&gt;&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/f/f2/Prototype.jpg/778px-Prototype.jpg&quot;
 /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
+       <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
+</item>
+<item>
        <title>Leif Lodahl: OpenOffice.org Newsletter is out (Danish)</title>
        
<guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8718185590131291864</guid>
        
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-newsletter-is-out-danish.html</link>
@@ -288,25 +310,6 @@
        <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
        <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author>
 </item>
-<item>
-       <title>Charles Schulz: Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-       
<guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</guid>
-       
<link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</link>
-       <description>&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I think it&amp;#8217;s 
a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The month of August was 
not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small revolution that went 
unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events inside the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was 
also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</description>
-       <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
-</item>
 
 </channel>
 </rss>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to