User: jpmcc Date: 2009-09-30 10:58:44+0000 Modified: marketing/www/planet/atom.xml marketing/www/planet/index.html marketing/www/planet/opml.xml marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Wed Sep 30 12:00:14 BST 2009 File Changes: Directory: /marketing/www/planet/ ================================= File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.2414&r2=1.2415 Delta lines: +59 -38 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-09-30 04:58:40+0000 1.2414 +++ atom.xml 2009-09-30 10:58:41+0000 1.2415 @@ -5,10 +5,51 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:25+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:26+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> <entry> + <title type="html">Results of the Renaissance Prototype Survey</title> + <link href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/results_of_the_renaissance_prototype"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/f0091b111ea0095f</id> + <updated>2009-09-29T18:00:12+00:00</updated> + <content type="html"><p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png" /></p> + <p>Those of you who tested the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">Renaissance</a> prototypes may have also +responded to the survey that popped up afterwards. All in all, there +were 1596 complete responses. (There were approx 1800, but the others were not complete) Thanks to Frank's hard work, the results have been compiled, evaluated and presented in a Calc file, however, omitting the comments from the text boxes which sometimes contained personal information that cannot legally be made public. (This has proven to be a continual problem with text boxes, so we are hoping to avoid this dilemma in future surveys by coming up with a solution that will comply with European data privacy laws and let us present all the data). The results in the Calc file be viewed +on the Renaissance <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/a/a7/Prototype_Extended_Feedback_s.ods">wiki.</a> <br /> <br />Here are the results from three of the statements in the survey. Just to +make you curious to see more <span><span> ;-) </span></span> <br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png" /></p> + <p>53% answered that they agree or agree totally that the current version of OpenOffice.org need a UI redesign. 32% answered that they disagree or disagree totally. This +tendency supports the idea of project Renaissance.<br /> </p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png" /></p> + <p>66% responded that they agree or agree totally with this statement about the prototypes, whereas only 14% said they disagree or disagree totally. That +means, that in these early stages of the project, conformity with user expectations is pretty good. From the comments (see Calc file), the live previews for formatting changes seem to have been especially well received.<br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png" /></p> + <p>Aside from the &quot;Neutral&quot; responses, the &quot;Agrees&quot; vs &quot;Disagrees&quot; are +about equal. That shows that the prototypes don't yet have a polished UI (which was never in scope for the prototypes up till now) and that there are still too many clicks necessary +to complete tasks.<br /><br />The fact that there are still too many clicks is okay, because this was to be expected. We had planned to address exactly that by way of the OOo Improvement program data. Frank Loehmann has begun to analyze this user feedback data under the aspect of +performing the most common tasks and will report on his findings when they are ready. +The idea is to figure out how to reduce the number of mouse clicks or +keyboard actions on the way to completing a task in the OpenOffice.org +office suite. +Stay tuned!<br /> <br />Thank you to everyone who filled out the survey. We really appreciate +the feedback. +Please continue to support our step by step effort to reach an improved UI.<br /> <br />The Renaissance Team + </p></content> + <author> + <name>Elizabeth Matthis</name> + <uri></uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> + <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> + <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + + <entry> <title type="html">Yet another city</title> <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852</id> @@ -25,7 +66,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -75,7 +116,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -103,7 +144,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -136,7 +177,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -157,7 +198,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -180,7 +221,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -236,7 +277,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -273,7 +314,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -294,7 +335,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -357,7 +398,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -381,7 +422,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -406,7 +447,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -427,7 +468,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -470,7 +511,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/-/OpenOffice.org"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:28+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:23+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -518,7 +559,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -542,7 +583,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -563,27 +604,7 @@ <title type="html">jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader</title> <link rel="self" href="http://www.google.co.uk/reader/public/atom/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast"/> <id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/06203502505240591501/state/com.google/broadcast</id> - <updated>2009-09-30T05:00:16+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry> - <title type="html">OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 released</title> - <link href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-243-released.html"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5093339025467706843</id> - <updated>2009-09-04T11:24:41+00:00</updated> - <content type="html">OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 has been released: <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">http://download.openoffice.org</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-5093339025467706843?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></content> - <author> - <name>floeff</name> - <email>[email protected]</email> - <uri>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">OpenOffice.org Marketing Blog</title> - <subtitle type="html">News and interesting stories about OpenOffice.org and other open source solutions.</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632</id> - <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:27+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:18+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.2421&r2=1.2422 Delta lines: +38 -15 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-09-30 04:58:41+0000 1.2421 +++ index.html 2009-09-30 10:58:41+0000 1.2422 @@ -36,10 +36,47 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 30, 2009 05:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on marketing topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: September 30, 2009 11:00 AM GMT</em></p> <h2>September 29, 2009</h2> <h3> +<a href="" title="jpmcc's shared items in Google Reader"> +GullFOSS</a> : +<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/results_of_the_renaissance_prototype";> +Results of the Renaissance Prototype Survey</a> +</h3> +<p> +<p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png"; /></p> + <p>Those of you who tested the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance";>Renaissance</a> prototypes may have also +responded to the survey that popped up afterwards. All in all, there +were 1596 complete responses. (There were approx 1800, but the others were not complete) Thanks to Frank's hard work, the results have been compiled, evaluated and presented in a Calc file, however, omitting the comments from the text boxes which sometimes contained personal information that cannot legally be made public. (This has proven to be a continual problem with text boxes, so we are hoping to avoid this dilemma in future surveys by coming up with a solution that will comply with European data privacy laws and let us present all the data). The results in the Calc file be viewed +on the Renaissance <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/a/a7/Prototype_Extended_Feedback_s.ods";>wiki.</a> <br /> <br />Here are the results from three of the statements in the survey. Just to +make you curious to see more <span><span> ;-) </span></span> <br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png"; /></p> + <p>53% answered that they agree or agree totally that the current version of OpenOffice.org need a UI redesign. 32% answered that they disagree or disagree totally. This +tendency supports the idea of project Renaissance.<br /> </p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png"; /></p> + <p>66% responded that they agree or agree totally with this statement about the prototypes, whereas only 14% said they disagree or disagree totally. That +means, that in these early stages of the project, conformity with user expectations is pretty good. From the comments (see Calc file), the live previews for formatting changes seem to have been especially well received.<br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png"; /></p> + <p>Aside from the "Neutral" responses, the "Agrees" vs "Disagrees" are +about equal. That shows that the prototypes don't yet have a polished UI (which was never in scope for the prototypes up till now) and that there are still too many clicks necessary +to complete tasks.<br /><br />The fact that there are still too many clicks is okay, because this was to be expected. We had planned to address exactly that by way of the OOo Improvement program data. Frank Loehmann has begun to analyze this user feedback data under the aspect of +performing the most common tasks and will report on his findings when they are ready. +The idea is to figure out how to reduce the number of mouse clicks or +keyboard actions on the way to completing a task in the OpenOffice.org +office suite. +Stay tuned!<br /> <br />Thank you to everyone who filled out the survey. We really appreciate +the feedback. +Please continue to support our step by step effort to reach an improved UI.<br /> <br />The Renaissance Team + </p></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/results_of_the_renaissance_prototype";>by Elizabeth Matthis at September 29, 2009 06:00 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> +<h3> <a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/search/label/OpenOffice.org"; title="Lodahl's blog"> Leif Lodahl</a> : <a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html";> @@ -516,20 +553,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h3> -<a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/"; title="OpenOffice.org Marketing Blog"> -OOo Marketeers</a> : -<a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-243-released.html";> -OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 released</a> -</h3> -<p> -OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 has been released: <a href="http://download.openoffice.org";>http://download.openoffice.org</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-5093339025467706843?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com"; /></div></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-243-released.html";>by floeff ([email protected]) at September 04, 2009 11:24 AM BST</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.2414&r2=1.2415 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-09-30 04:58:41+0000 1.2414 +++ opml.xml 2009-09-30 10:58:41+0000 1.2415 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Marketing Planet</title> - <dateModified>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:00:25 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:00:26 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Marketing Project</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.844&r2=1.845 Delta lines: +31 -8 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-09-29 22:58:50+0000 1.844 +++ rss10.xml 2009-09-30 10:58:42+0000 1.845 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/f0091b111ea0095f" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e55670ef42f62887" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/18675e5b74dc3bef" /> @@ -32,11 +33,40 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/3e423866cd8b7ed3" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/cb362c2446de68cf" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/ff1afc530ec306bd" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5093339025467706843" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/f0091b111ea0095f"> + <title>GullFOSS: Results of the Renaissance Prototype Survey</title> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/results_of_the_renaissance_prototype</link> + <content:encoded><p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png" /></p> + <p>Those of you who tested the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">Renaissance</a> prototypes may have also +responded to the survey that popped up afterwards. All in all, there +were 1596 complete responses. (There were approx 1800, but the others were not complete) Thanks to Frank's hard work, the results have been compiled, evaluated and presented in a Calc file, however, omitting the comments from the text boxes which sometimes contained personal information that cannot legally be made public. (This has proven to be a continual problem with text boxes, so we are hoping to avoid this dilemma in future surveys by coming up with a solution that will comply with European data privacy laws and let us present all the data). The results in the Calc file be viewed +on the Renaissance <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/a/a7/Prototype_Extended_Feedback_s.ods">wiki.</a> <br /> <br />Here are the results from three of the statements in the survey. Just to +make you curious to see more <span><span> ;-) </span></span> <br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png" /></p> + <p>53% answered that they agree or agree totally that the current version of OpenOffice.org need a UI redesign. 32% answered that they disagree or disagree totally. This +tendency supports the idea of project Renaissance.<br /> </p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png" /></p> + <p>66% responded that they agree or agree totally with this statement about the prototypes, whereas only 14% said they disagree or disagree totally. That +means, that in these early stages of the project, conformity with user expectations is pretty good. From the comments (see Calc file), the live previews for formatting changes seem to have been especially well received.<br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png" /></p> + <p>Aside from the &quot;Neutral&quot; responses, the &quot;Agrees&quot; vs &quot;Disagrees&quot; are +about equal. That shows that the prototypes don't yet have a polished UI (which was never in scope for the prototypes up till now) and that there are still too many clicks necessary +to complete tasks.<br /><br />The fact that there are still too many clicks is okay, because this was to be expected. We had planned to address exactly that by way of the OOo Improvement program data. Frank Loehmann has begun to analyze this user feedback data under the aspect of +performing the most common tasks and will report on his findings when they are ready. +The idea is to figure out how to reduce the number of mouse clicks or +keyboard actions on the way to completing a task in the OpenOffice.org +office suite. +Stay tuned!<br /> <br />Thank you to everyone who filled out the survey. We really appreciate +the feedback. +Please continue to support our step by step effort to reach an improved UI.<br /> <br />The Renaissance Team + </p></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-09-29T18:00:12+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Elizabeth Matthis</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852"> <title>Leif Lodahl: Yet another city</title> <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html</link> @@ -365,12 +395,5 @@ <dc:date>2009-09-04T15:16:58+00:00</dc:date> <dc:creator>Andreas Bartel</dc:creator> </item> -<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5093339025467706843"> - <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 released</title> - <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-243-released.html</link> - <content:encoded>OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 has been released: <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">http://download.openoffice.org</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-5093339025467706843?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-09-04T11:24:41+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>floeff</dc:creator> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://marketing.openoffice.org/source/browse/marketing/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.844&r2=1.845 Delta lines: +30 -8 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-09-29 22:58:50+0000 1.844 +++ rss20.xml 2009-09-30 10:58:42+0000 1.845 @@ -8,6 +8,36 @@ <description>Marketing Planet - http://marketing.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>GullFOSS: Results of the Renaissance Prototype Survey</title> + <guid>tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/f0091b111ea0095f</guid> + <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/results_of_the_renaissance_prototype</link> + <description><p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png" /></p> + <p>Those of you who tested the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">Renaissance</a> prototypes may have also +responded to the survey that popped up afterwards. All in all, there +were 1596 complete responses. (There were approx 1800, but the others were not complete) Thanks to Frank's hard work, the results have been compiled, evaluated and presented in a Calc file, however, omitting the comments from the text boxes which sometimes contained personal information that cannot legally be made public. (This has proven to be a continual problem with text boxes, so we are hoping to avoid this dilemma in future surveys by coming up with a solution that will comply with European data privacy laws and let us present all the data). The results in the Calc file be viewed +on the Renaissance <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/a/a7/Prototype_Extended_Feedback_s.ods">wiki.</a> <br /> <br />Here are the results from three of the statements in the survey. Just to +make you curious to see more <span><span> ;-) </span></span> <br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png" /></p> + <p>53% answered that they agree or agree totally that the current version of OpenOffice.org need a UI redesign. 32% answered that they disagree or disagree totally. This +tendency supports the idea of project Renaissance.<br /> </p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png" /></p> + <p>66% responded that they agree or agree totally with this statement about the prototypes, whereas only 14% said they disagree or disagree totally. That +means, that in these early stages of the project, conformity with user expectations is pretty good. From the comments (see Calc file), the live previews for formatting changes seem to have been especially well received.<br /><br /></p> + <p><img src="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png" /></p> + <p>Aside from the &quot;Neutral&quot; responses, the &quot;Agrees&quot; vs &quot;Disagrees&quot; are +about equal. That shows that the prototypes don't yet have a polished UI (which was never in scope for the prototypes up till now) and that there are still too many clicks necessary +to complete tasks.<br /><br />The fact that there are still too many clicks is okay, because this was to be expected. We had planned to address exactly that by way of the OOo Improvement program data. Frank Loehmann has begun to analyze this user feedback data under the aspect of +performing the most common tasks and will report on his findings when they are ready. +The idea is to figure out how to reduce the number of mouse clicks or +keyboard actions on the way to completing a task in the OpenOffice.org +office suite. +Stay tuned!<br /> <br />Thank you to everyone who filled out the survey. We really appreciate +the feedback. +Please continue to support our step by step effort to reach an improved UI.<br /> <br />The Renaissance Team + </p></description> + <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Leif Lodahl: Yet another city</title> <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852</guid> <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html</link> @@ -343,14 +373,6 @@ <p>In July, the team under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Kai-Uwe Hamborg visited us in Hamburg and the students were given the opportunity to present their redesign ideas to the UX team and the whole Imress team. We had a great discussion about current usability problems and how the designs proposed by the students might resolve the issues. For further details, please visit the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance:UOS_HCI_Study_Project_2009">projectâs Wiki page</a>. In the coming winter term, the students will be busy conducting a usability study in order to validate the designs. We will keep you updated about their progress.<br /><br />The second project was also initiated this spring with the support of Prof. Hamborg who is by the way one of the creators of the <a href="http://www.isometrics.uni-osnabrueck.de/">IsoMetrcs usability questionnaire</a>. Our goal was to collect detailed information about the usage of office productivity applications in a university context. An intern of the <a href="http://www.psycho.uni-osnabrueck.de/fach/aopsych/">Department of Work and Organizational Psychology</a> conducted interviews to collect information regarding the tasks the students use office tools for. The task inventory was then used as input for a survey. This survey was conducted in several universities using the freely available <a href="http://www.limesurvey.org/">LimeSurvey</a> software which is also used by several OpenOffice.org teams. Data collection was just finished, so for now no detailed information is available. They only data that is available at the moment is that over a thousand students participated in the study, OpenOffice.org seems to not to be the leading (by numbers) office productivity tool in university context and Linux, as an operating systems, seems to be ahead of Apple Mac. A detailed analysis is what follows and as soon as the data has been processed, results will be posted here or in the <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">Wiki of Project Renaissance.</a><br /><br />The results of the cooperation directly support <a href="http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Renaissance">Project Renaissance</a>. The data from the user feedback program gives us a clue about frequently used commands but with little task context, whereas detailed information from the task inventory survey will help us to map usage frequency on tasks. In addition, the study project might give us the opportunity to validate a few specific design solutions (e.g. sidepanes) with users. However, this is up to the study project team.<br /><br />Best,<br /><br />Andreas<br /> </p></description> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate> </item> -<item> - <title>OOo Marketeers: OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 released</title> - <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4887643299605448632.post-5093339025467706843</guid> - <link>http://ooomarketing.blogspot.com/2009/09/openofficeorg-243-released.html</link> - <description>OpenOffice.org 2.4.3 has been released: <a href="http://download.openoffice.org">http://download.openoffice.org</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width="1" height="1" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4887643299605448632-5093339025467706843?l=ooomarketing.blogspot.com" /></div></description> - <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:24:41 +0000</pubDate> - <author>[email protected] (floeff)</author> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/thumb/0/05/Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png/400px-Renaissance-Logo-Proposal-Final2.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/d/de/E1.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/6/69/D3.png"){kind=link}
![http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png"](http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/images/e/e9/A2.png"){kind=link}