OMG. This sucks. On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Theresa Kehoe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yup. Because of course they couldn't hold a bank accountable for > sending unencrypted files with sensitive information over inherently > insecure email, let alone without confirming the right recipient ahead > of time. > > t. > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 19:39 -0500, Nathan Nutter wrote: > > An example of BAD law being created regarding cloud-based services. > > > > A bank screws up and send private into to a gmail account...Judge > > orders account disabled and the identity of the user revealed... > > > > > http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=114264 > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) Main page: http://www.cwelug.org To post: [email protected] To subscribe: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
