Has anyone actually been able to find any "proof" of this yet? All I've been finding is the same story re-hashed with no citation/references.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Mike Bigalke <[email protected]> wrote: > OMG. This sucks. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Theresa Kehoe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yup. Because of course they couldn't hold a bank accountable for >> sending unencrypted files with sensitive information over inherently >> insecure email, let alone without confirming the right recipient ahead >> of time. >> >> t. >> >> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 19:39 -0500, Nathan Nutter wrote: >> > An example of BAD law being created regarding cloud-based services. >> > >> > A bank screws up and send private into to a gmail account...Judge >> > orders account disabled and the identity of the user revealed... >> > >> > >> > http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=114264 >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) Main page: http://www.cwelug.org To post: [email protected] To subscribe: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
