On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:57:04PM -0500, Scott Granneman wrote: > How about H.264?
That is a codec, the complaint is about Ogg, the transport layer. > On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Robert Citek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The author set things up beautifully, describing the faults of Ogg in >> great detail. He had me sold. I was expecting the pitch. I could >> even hear it in my head ... "But fear not. With the new wizbang >> container format all those issues are a thing of the past." Instead, >> he left me hanging. What a disappointment. >> >> There's gotta be a name for this kind of writing: complaining without >> offering a solution. Most political pundits and radio talk show hosts >> have mastered this style to an art. It's like complaining about the >> weather. All you can say is "yup, ain't it terrible?" and move on. >> >> Regards, >> - Robert >> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Scott Granneman >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> http://ffmpeg.org/~mru/hardwarebug.org/2010/03/03/ogg-objections/ -- David Dooling http://www.politigenomics.com/ -- Central West End Linux Users Group (via Google Groups) Main page: http://www.cwelug.org To post: [email protected] To subscribe: [email protected] To unsubscribe: [email protected] More options: http://groups.google.com/group/cwelug To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
