The project I use cxFreeze for is on Python 3.4 at the moment, so we'd need
to do that minor upgrade to be on 3.5 but that's likely not a problem. I
certainly don't have any need of it on Python 2.x at this point, myself.
Take care,
-Dan
[image: Dyn logo, Dyn.com] <http://dyn.com/>
*Dan McCombs * | Principal Software Engineer
p: 603.296.1568 | @danmccombs
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Anthony Tuininga <
anthony.tuini...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I am hoping to get your opinion on whether it makes sense to release
> cx_Freeze 6 as Python 3.5+ only. Python 2.7 is nearing the end of life and
> more and more people are using Python 3.5+ so it seems a reasonable time to
> consider this. cx_Freeze 5 would continue to exist for as long as Python
> 2.7 remains viable.
>
> One problem in particular that I have been working on solving is the
> removal of the dependency on the built-in definition of sys.path. This
> doesn't work on Ubuntu and doesn't work in a virtual environment. The
> correction doesn't work in Python 2.7 so I was planning on correcting this
> in cx_Freeze 6 and making it Python 3.5+. Any and all thoughts appreciated.
> Thanks!
>
> Anthony
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> cx-freeze-users mailing list
> cx-freeze-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cx-freeze-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
cx-freeze-users mailing list
cx-freeze-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cx-freeze-users
