What happens if you bump that value up to a couple seconds?
On 2/12/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan,
I'm not sure if that's it but the following looks weird (in
JMSBrokerSetup.java):
synchronized (this) {
broker.setPersistenceAdapter(new
MemoryPersistenceAdapter());
broker.addConnector(brokerUrl);
broker.start();
Thread.sleep(200); <---- why 200ms?
notifyAll();
}
Maybe broker.start() returns before actually the server ports are bound.
Jarek
On 2/12/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't reproduce this at all - can anyone else? Looking at the tests I
> can't seem to see anything that might go wrong either. I'm running
Windows
> Vista on a dual core on Java 1.5.0_10.
>
> - Dan
>
> On 2/9/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think there is some kind of a race condition in the JMS tests. Maybe
> > the server gets shutdown before the client gets to send its message. I
> > ran it a few times in a row. Sometimes they failed, sometimes they
> > passed.
> >
> > Here's the full stack trace of one of the exceptions:
> >
> > java.io.IOException: javax.jms.JMSException: Could not connect to
broker
> > URL: tc
> > p://localhost:61500. Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection
> > refused: conn
> > ect
> > at org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSConduit.send(
JMSConduit.java
> > :90)
> > at
org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.AbstractJMSTester.sendoutMessage
> > (Abstrac
> > tJMSTester.java:83)
> > at
> > org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSDestinationTest.testOneWayDestination
> > (JMSDestinationTest.java:142)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> > java:39)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (DelegatingMethodAcces
> > sorImpl.java:25)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java
:124)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> > at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
> > at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:230)
> > at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:225)
> > at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java
:24)
> > at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
> > at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java
:124)
> > at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> > java:39)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (DelegatingMethodAcces
> > sorImpl.java:25)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.battery.JUnitBattery.executeJUnit
> > (JUnitBatt
> > ery.java:242)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.battery.JUnitBattery.execute(
> > JUnitBattery.j
> > ava:216)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.executeBattery(
Surefire.java
> > :215)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:163)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:87)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:63)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> > java:39)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> > (DelegatingMethodAcces
> > sorImpl.java:25)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.SurefireBooter.main(
> > SurefireBooter.java:785
> > )
> >
> > I'm running this on Windows XP, dual core processor.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > On 2/9/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The unit tests should set up the server automatically. Maybe you
have
> > > something on that port or have a firewall blocking it? Which test is
> > this?
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > On 2/9/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Quick question: the JMS unit tests require an external server to
be
> > > > running in background in order for them to pass?
> > > >
> > > > Here's what I'm seeing:
> > > >
> > > > java.io.IOException: javax.jms.JMSException: Could not connect to
> > broker
> > > > URL: tc
> > > > p://localhost:61500. Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection
> > > > refused: conn
> > > > ect
> > > > at org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSConduit.send(
> > JMSConduit.java
> > > > :90)
> > > > at
> > org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.AbstractJMSTester.sendoutMessage
> > > > (Abstrac
> > > > tJMSTester.java:83)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jarek
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dan Diephouse
> > > Envoi Solutions
> > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
