Glen,
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 13:44, Glen Mazza wrote:
> > + String interfaceName = jp.getInterfaceClass();
> > (A) JavaInterface intf =
> > interfaces.get(interfaceName); (B)+ if (intf == null)
> > {
> > (C)+ interfaceName = jp.getPortType();
> > (D)+ intf = interfaces.get(interfaceName);
> > (E)+ }
>
> There may be a bug here (and in the two cases below). Namely, I can't
> see the reason for statement (D) above. If (A) results in intf being
> set to NULL, lines (B) - (E) will be activated. But how can statement
> (D) set intf to anything but null again--statement (C) has no side
> effect in adding interface names to the interfaces object.
Line (C) results in a new value for interfaceName which results in a new
value being used to lookup stuff from the interfaces Map. The map
doesn't change, the lookup key does.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
