Oops! How could I have missed that?
Glen
Am Mittwoch, den 01.08.2007, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> Glen,
>
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007 13:44, Glen Mazza wrote:
> > > + String interfaceName = jp.getInterfaceClass();
> > > (A) JavaInterface intf =
> > > interfaces.get(interfaceName); (B)+ if (intf == null)
> > > {
> > > (C)+ interfaceName = jp.getPortType();
> > > (D)+ intf = interfaces.get(interfaceName);
> > > (E)+ }
> >
> > There may be a bug here (and in the two cases below). Namely, I can't
> > see the reason for statement (D) above. If (A) results in intf being
> > set to NULL, lines (B) - (E) will be activated. But how can statement
> > (D) set intf to anything but null again--statement (C) has no side
> > effect in adding interface names to the interfaces object.
>
> Line (C) results in a new value for interfaceName which results in a new
> value being used to lookup stuff from the interfaces Map. The map
> doesn't change, the lookup key does.
>
>
