We have a sample named 'js_client'. It's a sample of pulling the regular
CXF client from Java into Rhino using Rhino's import technology.

I would propose to rename it. It seems to me that most people would
expect 'javascript in the browser' when they see just plain js.

However, if others prefer to leave this name alone, please help me out
and suggest a new name for the sample of generated js.




Reply via email to