Sounds like a good idea. js_rhino_import? But I don't really care about the name.
But before you call your new sample js_client, do you plan on have two or three samples, each of which reasonably could be called js_client? If so, you might want to have a more descriptive name. If not, js_client is cool. Glen Am Dienstag, den 11.12.2007, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: > We have a sample named 'js_client'. It's a sample of pulling the regular > CXF client from Java into Rhino using Rhino's import technology. > > I would propose to rename it. It seems to me that most people would > expect 'javascript in the browser' when they see just plain js. > > However, if others prefer to leave this name alone, please help me out > and suggest a new name for the sample of generated js. > > > >
