Thanks. Relatedly, if wsdl2java produces 'the wrong thing' in terms of field type, is there some wsdl extension to shake it by the lapels?
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:17 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote: > > There is a wsdl for MtoM. It seems to have a fairly simple structure > > of types and elements. > > > > Yet the wsdl2java for it concocts these complex INOUT holders. > > > > Why? > > Because the names (and types) of parameters for the INs match the names > of the OUTS. Thus, the spec state that those are to be considered > INOUT parameters which thus require Holders. >
