On Thursday 17 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote: > Thanks. > > Relatedly, if wsdl2java produces 'the wrong thing' in terms of field > type, is there some wsdl extension to shake it by the lapels?
I guess the question is: what do you mean by "wrong thing"? Dan > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:17 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > There is a wsdl for MtoM. It seems to have a fairly simple > > > structure of types and elements. > > > > > > Yet the wsdl2java for it concocts these complex INOUT holders. > > > > > > Why? > > > > Because the names (and types) of parameters for the INs match the > > names of the OUTS. Thus, the spec state that those are to be > > considered INOUT parameters which thus require Holders. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
