I disagree with both. The CVS commit log, not JIRA, is the authoritative source of changes made to the product, anyone who needs that level of detail can go through those logs. JIRA is for bugs not fixed yet.
Glen Am Montag, den 21.01.2008, 15:47 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp: > On Monday 21 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote: > > 1) If you find a bug that a user might find, make a JIRA, even if you > > are fixing it on the spot. This allows users of the previous release > > to find it in JIRA. > > +1 > This also makes the release notes much more accurate. The release notes > are based on the JIRA entries and having a fairly complete picture is > important. > > > > 2) If you fix a bug, add some remark to the JIRA as to the nature of > > the bug and the fix. > > Well, I'm not sure if that is necessary. If you put the JIRA number in > the commit message and describe it there, it will automatically appear > in the "Subversion" tag of the JIRA instance. > >
