Re: Two methodological proposals

[Dan Diephouse]

Benson Margulies wrote: On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:25 -0500, Glen Mazza wrote: I disagree with both. The CVS commit log, not JIRA, is the authoritative source of changes made to the product, anyone who needs that level of detail can go through those logs. JIRA is for bugs not fixed yet. Glen, I'm more interested in defending the first than the second. User hits problem. What do we want user to do? Search JIRA and see if it is a known problem. We don't expect users to search the svn commit logs. --benson Yeah, I gotta support Benson here. Its very helpful from a standpoint of a user who runs into a bug IMO. It shouldn't be too finally grained though, so use good judgement :-) - Dan -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog