Is there any JIRA created for this issue? If not, I can go ahead and created one.
Thanks, Bo On 10/31/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At least in > > the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control the > > form, only the namespace. > > That's kind of the point. If @XmlElement is not there or if the > namespace attribute is unspecified, it uses the namespace information > from the package-info which is should be whatever from the default is > for the schema. > > If the element in the schema has a "form" that doesn't match the default, > jaxb will output either: > > 1) @XmlElement(namespace = "") (unqualified) > 2) @XmlElement(namespace = "http://blah.blah.blah";) (qualified, namespace > will match the schema namespace) > > Dan > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: Benson Margulies > > > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb > > > > > > > > > Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it > > > > outputs > > > > > the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute. > > > If > > > > it > > > > > does agree, it doesn't. > > > > > > Something like that at least. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that > > > > has > > > > > > a form= that disagrees with the schema default. > > > > > > > > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I > > > > just > > > > > > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged. > > > > > > -- > > > J. Daniel Kulp > > > Principal Engineer > > > IONA > > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer > IONA > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
