At this point, I think that a JIRA would say, 'Enhance the type_test system to allow for both qualified and unqualified default element forms, and then add test cases for various uses of the form= property of XML schema, and then see if there are bugs.'
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bozhong Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 12:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb > > Is there any JIRA created for this issue? If not, I can go ahead and > created > one. > > Thanks, > Bo > > On 10/31/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At least in > > > the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control the > > > form, only the namespace. > > > > That's kind of the point. If @XmlElement is not there or if the > > namespace attribute is unspecified, it uses the namespace information > > from the package-info which is should be whatever from the default is > > for the schema. > > > > If the element in the schema has a "form" that doesn't match the default, > > jaxb will output either: > > > > 1) @XmlElement(namespace = "") (unqualified) > > 2) @XmlElement(namespace = "http://blah.blah.blah";) (qualified, > namespace > > will match the schema namespace) > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Benson Margulies > > > > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it > > > > > > outputs > > > > > > > the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute. > > > > If > > > > > > it > > > > > > > does agree, it doesn't. > > > > > > > > Something like that at least. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > a form= that disagrees with the schema default. > > > > > > > > > > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > J. Daniel Kulp > > > > Principal Engineer > > > > IONA > > > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > > > > > -- > > J. Daniel Kulp > > Principal Engineer > > IONA > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >
