Placing this in the pom seems to allow it to work now (but it raising another
problem I'll start hunting down next):
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.ws.commons.schema</groupId>
<artifactId>XmlSchema</artifactId>
<version>1.3.2</version>
</dependency>
But adding this dependency to my pom.xml raises the question: why would I
need to explicitly include this, wouldn't it be normally detected by Maven
via the transitive dependencies required by CXF?
Thanks,
Glen
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> You need to update the version of XmlSchema. The version we used in
> 2.0.2 had too many bugs that we couldn't work around. In 2.0.3, it was
> updated to 1.3.2, which STILL has a bunch of bugs we cannot work
> around, :-( but it does fix a few others and does provide us an
> oportunity to work around a few others. We're trying to push to get a
> 1.3.3 released to fix some of the other issues, but they aren't being
> too helpful with that, which is frustrating.
>
> FYI: the ExtensionDeserializer dependency is to work around one of the
> bugs. The default extension deserializer loses most extensors (keeps
> only the last one) and treats namespace declarations as extensors as
> well. Thus, it loses things all over the place, especially with mtom
> schemas that throw xmime extensors on the base64 things. We created
> our own ExtenstionDeserializer that actually works correctly. 1.3.3
> SHOULD be fixed, at which point we can remove our version.
>
> Dan
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2008, Glen Mazza wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> As a result of upgrading from CXF 2.0.2 to 2.0.3, a test is failing
>> because the below class could not be found.
>> I'm using Maven for builds and tests, and am *not* bringing in every
>> possible CXF dependency as defined here[1].
>>
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/apache/ws/commons/schema/extensions/ExtensionDeserializer
>>
>> Question: Does anyone know what dependency am I missing, such that
>> this class can be found in 2.0.2 but *not* in 2.0.3? (Alternatively,
>> it is possible that this class is never used in 2.0.2, hence why it
>> works with that version.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glen
>>
>> [1]
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/building-your-cxf-project-with-maven.
>>html
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/2.0.2-to-2.0.3-causes-NoClassDefFoundError%3A-ExtensionDeserializer-tp15069327p15070276.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
