On Friday 04 April 2008, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Do the mailing lists have any problems ? I'm only receiving half of
> the messages :-( Or sometimes a few hours later ...

I've had to moderate a couple of them through so I'm the bottleneck.   A 
couple people aren't using the EXACT email address they are subscribed 
with (or are using nabble or something) so they get stuck in the 
moderation queue until I see it.

Dan


>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 04 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hmm I'm not familiar with Apache ServiceMix so it's a bit
> > > difficult for me to understand how this can help me with an OSGi
> > > platform like Equinox.
>
> Because ServiceMix Kernel *is* an OSGi platform based on Felix
> with some value added.  So everything that applies to Servicemix
> Kernel can be applied to any other OSGi platform, Equinox included.
> Bundles are bundles, eh ;-)
>
> > > I understand that CXF is provided as a module for ServiceMix,
> > > right? Can you provide some help on getting CXF to work on a
> > > "normal" OSGi platform? I had a look at the MANIFEST files of the
> > > CXF libraries but I couldn't find entries for OSGi. I'm a bit
> > > confused. :-)
> >
> > Basically, starting with 2.0.5, the big cxf bundle jar
> > (cxf-2.0.5-incubator.jar, cxf-bundle if you are looking for the
> > maven artifactId) does include an OSGI manifest. (although I noticed
> > Guillaume did a fix for it last  night so I'm not sure if the 2.0.5
> > version complete works, I'll get a 2.0.6 snapshot going now.)   That
> > said, since CXF doesn't really do any OSGI things ourselves, we
> > don't worry about all the thirdparty jars.  ServiceMix does.  So
> > basically, we have a bundle, but to really use it, you'll need to
> > find/create a few other bundles for the third party deps (like
> > jaxws-api, neethi, spring, wsdl4j, woodstox/stax, etc...). 
> > ServiceMix does provide bundles for all of those, but you probably
> > could easily do much of that yourself as well.
>
> Yeah, there is a small problem with 2.0.5 OSGi manifest.
> Another way is to create one big bundle that includes all the
> dependencies if you prefer.
>
> > The other thing SMX is providing is the cxf-osgi spring import thing
> > that provides an OSGi http transport for the CXF component.   That
> > might be a good thing to pull directly into CXF as that should
> > definitely be usable in other OSGi environments.
>
> Yes, it should.  It can certainly be moved to CXF, was I just hacked
> it this week.  But this is more a discussion for cxf-dev btw.
>
> > Dan
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: Re-2: Using CXF in OSGi (04-Apr-2008 11:51)
> > > From:    Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To:      [email protected]
> > >
> > > > The example I gave leverages Spring-DM.  Spring-DM is a small
> > > > layer above Spring that gives you a really simple way to build
> > > > OSGi applications based on Spring.  Of course, if you don't like
> > > > spring, don't use Spring-DM. However, CXF is nicely integrated
> > > > with Spring, so it makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > If you prefer, we also support OpenEJB / CXF in OSGi, though
> > > > this is not finalized yet (but feedback and/or help is always
> > > > welcome).  In this model, the EJB3 annotated beans are
> > > > automatically discovered and exposed.  So no spring at all, and
> > > > EJB3 annotations: it could make you happy ;-)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jacek Laskowski
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:04 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Will Spring-DM also be a part of this example?
> > > > >
> > > > > It really doesn't change much if it can be done with OSGi
> > > > > itself. Spring-DM is just an additional layer that lets use
> > > > > biuld bundles yet it could in turn complicate understanding of
> > > > > the real value of CXF on OSGi. I'm looking forward to seeing
> > > > > the example. Go Guillaume, go! ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Jacek
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jacek Laskowski
> > > > > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to